Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Got Juice?

SI Magazine published their most recent expose on Steroids and HGH use in America, not just by athletes. Pretty interesting read.

Some facts/tidbits leapt out at me:

  • 2.4 million testosterone prescriptions were filled by U.S. pharmacies in 2004, more than twice the number filled in 2000.
  • Three million people in the U.S. use anabolic steroids, the synthetic versions of testosterone that are illegal when they are used for nonmedical reasons
  • John Romano, senior editor at Muscular Development, the top seller among the dozens of magazines that cover powerlifting and bodybuilding, estimates that 15 million Americans use performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs).
  • From Dr. Charles Yesalis, a retired Penn State professor and a recognized authority on steroids: "The teens I've talked to say [steroids and HGH] are as easy to get as marijuana."
  • Last May in Australia the 61-year-old Sylvester Stallone paid $10,600 to settle a charge of criminal drug possession after he was found to have 48 vials of HGH and several vials of testosterone. Stallone has since acknowledged that he takes HGH and testosterone regularly, and legally. "Everyone over 40 years old would be wise to investigate it [HGH and testosterone use] because it increases the quality of your life," Stallone told Time last month.
So what's the line? Where is it? Is it OK for me to get a legal perscription for HGH to get myself looking and feeling 15-20 years younger but not professional athletes and entertainers? Is it OK for entertainers like Stallone but not pro athletes? Is my only impediment finding a doctor to prescribe it to me?

As time permits, I need to get more educated on the side effects and long term effects of HGH. Why shouldn't I give it a shot (no pun intended, I swear!) to give myself a boost in getting back in shape? Is being out of shape (even a little) worse for you than taking something that will help you get back into shape? What about someone who is really outta shape? Isn't that worse? Now, I am not talking about steroids; the long term and short term effects are well documented but I have yet to hear much about HGH effects.

If anyone has any good documentation or sources for the short/long term effects of HGH, please send it my way.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Smarter than the average bear?

Seems that while most of the attention goes to fireballing young phenoms Joba Chanberlain and Phil Hughes, it's lower-key Ian Kennedy who is generating a bit of chatter lately. While IPK, as he's oft-referenced in Yankees circles, can pitch to 91-92 MPH when he wants to dial up the fastball, his real skills like within his pinpoint control. This has resulted in many scouts likening his style and approach to a lofty peer: Greg Maddux.

Evidently, IPK's smarter than the average bear, er, pitcher. That's good since the change in pace from the Joba/Hughes heaters will be a nice weapon. Yanks fans certainly hope so as IPK was reportedly a key piece of the offer the Yanks turned down from the Twins in any Johan Santana trade. Pretty impressive.

Last night, for example, he threw four scoreless innings against the Reds that had one scout in attendance likening at least one impressive sequence to the way Greg Maddux made pitching look easy in his prime.

Yes, Kennedy is the artist of the Yankee trio, dazzling hitters more with his ability to hit corners and change speeds than with high heat. Not that he's a soft-tosser - at 91-92 mph, his fastball has some pop - but he zoomed through the minors in his first professional season in 2007 because of his command of the fastball and a changeup that has Johan Santana-like qualities.
------
It was an inning that made one American League scout at the game last night nod in admiration and say: "That was a Greg Maddux inning."

"A lot of people who have seen him think he's a No.3 starter at best in the American League because he doesn't have the big fastball," one AL executive said yesterday. "But I've heard a couple of scouts say they think he can be more than that because he has such great location with his fastball and he's got a great changeup."


IPK had a nice debut last year, starting 3 games, lasting 19 IP, posting a 1.89 ERA with a nifty 1.158 WHIP. Hope that's just a sample of what's to come this year.

A look behind the lens

As one of many "former collectors" of Topps baseball cards, this article certainly struck a note. Now that my sons are getting into cards, I find myself going thru my stacks of cards reminiscing about them and that time in my life. Yes, Cardboard Gods has the market cornered on baseball card nostalgia, but the Gene Wojo article brings the photographer in front of the camera for his story.
Some of the interesting tidbits:

A Mark McGwire card features a Forwerck photo of the St. Louis first baseman diving for a line drive. Look hard and you'll see the company artist took out the umpire in the background, but forgot to take out the umpire's shadow.
------
Barry Bonds promised 30 minutes for a Topps shoot. Instead, Forwerck got him to stay for more than two hours. Turns out Bonds is a huge photography geek.

"Of all the big-name athletes I've shot, I've never met anyone more personable or interested in what I did than him," says Forwerck. "I love Barry. He's my hero."
Now, I just have to hope my 1975 Cookie Rojas is worth something.

Quick Fantasy Baseball thing

I know not everyone plays fantasy baseball, so I will keep this to one quick thing: I'd be downgrading Carlos Beltran in your pre-draft rankings. Part of Beltran's value is tied to his speed and when I read this, all I thought was that he's not going to steal many this year unless he shows a dramatic improvement soon. I know you are not supposed to read too much into spring training, but this is a big red flag:

As for Carlos Beltran, who made his debut as the DH, he remains a work in progress. Beltran went 0-for-3, grounding into a double play, and told reporters afterward that his left knee is feeling sore. Not the sharp pain of a year ago, but it seems that his knee is absorbing too much of the pounding lately due to his weak left quadriceps muscle.

Monday, March 10, 2008

At least their lockerroom is feeling good

Thankfully the Bonds cloud has lifted the spirits and joviality in the S.F. Giants lockerroom this season as Keith Law notes (Insider access required, sorry), it's going to be a long, ugly season for the black and orange:


Giants' fans are in for a long, ugly season. The team started nearly all of its projected regulars on Sunday against Morales and a JV Colorado squad -- Todd Helton, Troy Tulowitzki, Matt Holliday, and Brad Hawpe all stayed home -- and lost 10-2, mustering just five hits and playing some uninspired baseball. The buyer's remorse may already be setting in with Aaron Rowand, who looks out of shape and didn't run out a two-out groundball in the first with a man on third. Ray Durham is a statue at second base. Other than Matt Cain and Tim Lincecum, there aren't many reasons to go see the Giants this year; check back in 2010 when the fruits of the '07 draft start to trickle in.
It's good to hear back from Keith after about a month's hiatus from his blog.

Beckett's an ornery sort

Not that I'd blame him one bit, but seems that Sox ace Josh Beckett's back is barking and he's pretty ornery about it. Except that folks are seemingly forgetting his "injury prone" label he wore proudly before last year. Remember the blisters, disk issues, etc. (see bottom of posting)?


He did an admirable job trying not to blame the mound conditions (and grounds crew, by proxy) but he was definitely wearing his angry pants today:

"I don't know. If I'd had as much progress from yesterday to today as I did from the first day to the second day, I wouldn't have ruled that out. Today I'm just holding up my obligation (to talk to media). It probably would have been better to talk to you guys yesterday because I was a little more optimistic. I'm in a pretty crappy mood as far as this thing goes because it was a pretty frustrating day because yesterday was good and today's kind of horse(bleep).''
------
"Yes. We've done a number of tests. There's nothing wrong with the disks, and I think that's what they wanted to make sure of. It's definitely a strained muscle or pulled muscle, whatever you want to call it. It heals when it heals.''
------
"I was a lot more optimistic yesterday than I am today. A lot of that has to do with being in a (expletive) mood because I didn't sleep well.''

So the questions are starting to mount for the Sox vaunted rotation:
  1. Will Schilling pitch at all and if he does, will he be any good?
  2. Will Beckett's back be an issue all year?
  3. Will Dice-K be any better than he was last year?
  4. Can Wakefield's balky back hold up to added work?
  5. Will Colon be able to duct-tape his shoulder together to get anything out of it?
  6. Will Lester be anything more than a #3?
  7. Will Buchholz be expected to pitch 200 IP? Can he handle that, if required? He's gotten shelled during Spring Training, FWIW.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Some of Beckett's injury history:
  • May 17, 2007: Finger injury, 15-day DL.
  • May 14, 2007: Finger injury, day-to-day.
  • Oct 4, 2005: Missed the last 17 games of the regular season.
  • Oct 2, 2005: Missed 8 games to the end of the regular season (shoulder injury).
  • Sep 28, 2005: Shoulder injury, day-to-day.
  • Sep 15, 2005: Achilles tendon, day-to-day.
  • Jul 30, 2005: Missed 14 games (lower back strain).
  • Jul 23, 2005: Missed 13 games (oblique injury).
  • Jul 15, 2005: Lower back strain, 15-day DL.
  • Jul 8, 2005: Oblique injury, 15-day DL.
  • Jul 5, 2005: Oblique injury, day-to-day.
  • Jun 30, 2005: Missed 13 games (blister).
  • Jun 17, 2005: Blister, 15-day DL (retroactive to Jun 15).
  • Jun 15, 2005: Blister, day-to-day.

Rangers to close Yankee stadium

I think it's a great idea.

I don't want to hear the "purists" who insist that the last game in Yankee Stadium MUST be a Yankee game. So what? Who'll ultimately remember that? But a rare outdoor Rangers game in Yankee Stadium could be incredible.


The House that Ruth Built is on track to be the house the Rangers bring down.
Momentum has built in recent weeks toward finalizing a deal that would have the Rangers play the final game in the storied history of the current Stadium, the Daily News has learned. The Yankees, who will move into their new Yankee Stadium for the 2009 baseball season, are said to be completely on board with having the NHL close the 85-year-old original.
So spare me the hystrionics and chest beating. This will be great. I'd prefer to see the Rangers play one of the Original Six, particularly the Canadiens (the Yanks of hockey, or are the Yanks the Canadiens of baseball?). But I'd take a nice rivalry game against the Islanders any day of the week. Just to hear the "Potvin Sucks" chant from 57K people outside rather than 19K inside.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

You ain't getting squat

For all those, like me, who dig memorabilia, don't hold your breath waiting for the NYC Department of Parks and Recreation to hold an auction of any and all Yankee Stadium "stuff".

The department has operated the ballpark since the city purchased it from the team in 1972. There's no timetable set yet for the demolition of the famed stadium, which has stood near the Harlem River in the Bronx since 1923, nor have details been finalized for the planned auction.

Even the Baseball Hall of Fame, which certainly will be in line ahead of the public, doesn't have any grand expectations.

"Remember, everything was new after the (1973-74) renovation," said Jeff Idelson, Hall of Fame vice president. "We already have Babe Ruth's locker and one than was used by (Joe) DiMaggio, then (Mickey) Mantle and Bobby Murcer."

I'd love to buy a strip of 3 seats (and I know it'd be much to my wife's dismay) and find a home for them somewhere. I can imagine having those three blue seats next to the sofa, watching a nice flat screen....Even if they are not the "original" Yankee Stadium seats, it'd be great to have a piece of history.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Vegas, baby, Vegas!

A programming note: Unless something jumps up early Thursday, I will likely be on hiatus until Monday. A long-planned, eagerly-anticipated Boys Weekend in Vegas is the reason. And a darn good one, I think.


No truth to the rumor that I am stalking the ESPN Fantasy guys; purely a coincidence, though Berry went to Syracuse the same years as me. Can't say I remember him from school though.

And what is happening there Friday, March 7, is the Las Vegas Fantasy First Pitch Party at the ESPN Zone in the New York, New York Hotel & Casino. Free to attend, free refreshments and, most importantly, free advice for the upcoming fantasy baseball season. Join me, Eric Karabell, and Stephania Bell (our injury expert) at 7 p.m. this Friday.

Great news: Murcer cancer-free

GREAT news for a wonderful ambassador of the game!

"We received great news this morning," Murcer said in statement released by the Yankees on Wednesday. "The biopsy revealed scar tissue. It showed no signs of cancer. It's what we had hoped for all along. I plan on resting at home over the next few weeks and focusing my energy on returning to the stadium for its final opening day. My family and I thank everyone for their prayers, e-mails, cards and thoughts."

Word of the Day: Complicity

com·plic·i·ty [kuhm-plis-i-tee]
the state of being an accomplice; partnership or involvement in wrongdoing: complicity in a crime.



Another very well done article from ESPN's investigative reporter TJ Quinn about how the culture of baseball helped steriod usage blossom since the 1980's.

Center in Quinn's article is how tainted Torre and LaRussa have become as a result of the Mitchell Report. Quinn mentions that 20 players named in the Report have been managed, at some time, by Torre. That's pretty incredible. LaRussa's blind loyalty to McGwire is particularly damning, as is his Oakland/St.Louis loyalty to Dave McKay:

LaRussa's longtime first-base coach, Dave McKay, has never been accused of directly aiding and abetting steroid users, but he was certainly in their proximity. LaRussa made McKay his first strength coach in Oakland; McKay says he never thought that the change in player physiques had anything to do with drugs.
But, while we all knew it's true, it's particularly eye-opening to read just how complicity both sides of MLB are in this mess, Union and Management (emphasis mine):

Even when physicians and trainers began to raise the issue of performance-enhancing drugs in the late 1980s, baseball's sentinels were either unwilling to tackle the problem or unable to find an approach they could agree on, baseball insiders said.

"At one of those [offseason] meetings, a team physician stood up and said, 'We have a problem, and the problem has to do with possible drugs that are being used by athletes and players, and the only way we can deal with this problem is through testing,'" says Larry Starr, a team athletic trainer for 30 years with the Cincinnati Reds and Florida Marlins. "The basic feedback from that meeting and subsequent meetings for a number of years after that was, from the owner's group, 'We agree: We need to do testing. But the Players Association won't let us.' Players Association would say, 'We agree: Most of my members would say testing would be fine, but we don't trust the owners.'"


Speaking about the "culture" and sanctity of the lockerroom, Torre added this, lending further creedence to his complicity and flat-out fear of players reacting negatively to any PED questions. I guess this is how you earn the reputation of being a "player's manager"; letting them do whatever the hell they want without any fear of recourse or retribution:
"You've got to manage these players and you want to earn their trust, so you've got to allow them responsibility to take care of themselves," he says. "I'm not saying you don't talk about it. You're always cautioning them that you don't want to be embarrassed by this or that. [But] you don't follow players around or peek around the corner or whatever."

Tom Glavine, one of the most respected players in recent history, also shed light upon this culture and why players wouldn't make this a bigger issue: it was helping their teams win.

"Everybody, from the minute they get to the clubhouse, it's, 'What goes on in the clubhouse stays in the clubhouse,'" Glavine says, sitting on a dugout bench at the Braves' spring training complex in Orlando. "And that's team fights, or team arguments or team meetings. All that stuff is supposed to remain in-house. That's the culture of the game and it doesn't matter if a guy has a drinking problem, or a guy is doing drugs or a guy is doing things in their marriages they shouldn't be doing. You just don't discuss that."

All that has ever mattered, he says, is performance.

"When guys start crossing the lines, [if] their actions or things they are doing become a detriment to the team or become a safety issue to the rest of the teammates, then it becomes a different issue," he says.

So, clean players let dirty players help the team, but only if they were truly helping the team. Sadly hypocritical, if you ask me. High character guys like Glavine, Smoltz and Maddux (just picking on this amazing troika from the Braves, sorry) should have used their well-earned respect and voices to empart change, or at least make this a bigger issue than it was back in the day.

Remember, too, it was Glavine and Maddux who did the infamous "chicks dig the long ball" commercials...


Maybe now, post-Mitchell Report, players will be more vocal internally and react before things become too much of an issue. I doubt it as cultures don't change this quickly, but I remain ever hopeful!

Play ball!

Things that make you CRINGE

I type this with my teeth grinding together. Have fun. (thanks to Rob Neyer for furthering the pain, Insider access required)

Felix Pie seems to have gotten his juevos twisted. Good lord. Although, I knew a guy who had this happen back in college and I remember hearing him scream in pain. Can't be a pleasant thing.

Felix Pie missed a couple of days early because of a twisted testicle.

Reliving Junior Griffey's hurt, though this dates back to last Fall:

Griffey said he didn't remember anything after the initial shock of pain. He said he knew he threw it, but not sure where."The best way I can describe it is it felt like somebody bungee jumped off my right nut," Griffey said.

Although, seems that Junior has a proclivity to injuring his twig and berries.

Ken Griffey Jr. once missed a game for the Mariners when he pinched himself with his protective cup.

hat tip to 100% Injury Rate who has the definitive list of dumb sports injuries.

Time to stop whining, fellas

Looks like the list of 2nd year players who have had their contracts "renewed" and are unhappy about it is growing. The whining, while understandable as they see the major loot the more established players are getting, has got to stop. The system over-penalizes players thru their early years and over-rewards as they mature. I'll tell ya what, if the players don't like it, go find something else to do. They knew this system has been in place for years and what it might mean to them if they overperform their salary. Tough. Grind your teeth, play hard and get paid when it's your time. Until then, stop the whining.

Clubs can renew the contracts of players who have spent less than three years in the major leagues. The only restrictions are the team must pay the major league minimum, $390,000, and no player can get more than a 20% pay cut. Yet, with the minimum salary rising from $109,000 since 1996, clubs are factoring in the raises players automatically get.

And Papelbon seems to be next in line to be upset about getting his contract renewed. I can hardly wait.


Closer Jonathan Papelbon hopes to avoid any unpleasantness by reaching an agreement with the Boston Red Sox before they renew his contract on Thursday. "I don't want to renew," he told reporters Tuesday. "I don't want to. But if I have to, I have to."
At least they aren't hiding behind the "it's not about the money" excuse!!!

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Great moments in Scouting

OFFCOLOR TOPIC WARNING

Boston Red Sox scout Jesse Levis, 39, gave the term "scouting" a new definition yesterday. Rather than peering into a camera and feverishly jotting notes on ballplayers, he was nabbed peering out his 2nd floor hotel window at underage girls, feverishly, um, stirring the franks and beans.

"His explanation didn't add up," said police spokesman Rob Vega. "We have four witnesses who say he was standing there 40 minutes. Rearranging your clothes and masturbating are definitely two different things."

Wonder if the Red Sox fans who mugged a Yankee fan in Cambridge would do the same to this guy?

And not for nothing, maybe it's just me, but doesn't this dude look 10+ years older than 39?

Jesse Levis, way to get yourself booted out from the inside of MLB, a dream most of us would love to have.

When good fans go bad

Yeah, yeah, yeah...I'm a Yanks fan. I understand the hate. I can live with it. I also understand the RedSox Nation. I dig their fervor, passion, knowledge, allegiance (not Affleck or pink hats, though). I respect them as competitors. They make my team work harder to be better. I also like to think that deep down, they feel the same way. Yes, I know they hate the MFY, but I'm not sure if SunTsu said it, but you must respect the enemy.


All that said, there is ZERO room for this sorta thing:

A group of men — some with Irish accents — beat up a 23-year-old Cambridge man and sent him to the hospital after they spotted him sporting a Yankees baseball cap.

The Yankees fan was transported to the hospital March 2 at 1:41 a.m. for medical treatment for head injuries, including swelling over his entire face and several facial cuts, according to police reports.

That the paper felt compelled to mention the Irish accents is completely unnecessary except to exacerbate the stereotypes. A waste of 4 words. They may as well called them 'racists', too. But, I digress...

I'm in no way saying that this doesn't occur on "our turf", but it doesn't belong anywhere, period. I am, however, very curious to see if there's any outcry against Boston fans as there surely would be if a fan wearing a Boston hat got jumped in NYC ("Those Yanks fans are louts, thugs, obnoxious, dangerous and evil...blah blah blah")

NFL hypocrisy

I try to keep this to baseball 90% of the time (or more), but sometimes there's a tailor-made "it is about the money" comment that needs to make an appearance here. Courtesy of Peter King's SI.com MMQB column this week:

Quote of the Week II
"I just want to be able to win and get back to the Super Bowl.''
--Philadelphia cornerback Asante Samuel, who got $20 million guaranteed in a six-year, $57 million contract with the Eagles on Friday.

If that's what was most important, then why didn't Samuel stay with New England? Does he, or his agent, really think the Eagles have a better shot to get back to the Super Bowl than the Patriots in the next two or three years?

"I just want to be able to win and get back to the Super Bowl.''

You know what I want? I want one of these guys, just once, to say, "You know, I do want to win, but facts are facts. The Patriots were only going to pay me $6 million a year. The Eagles went to $9.5M a year. Do I look that stupid to turn down all that money?'' But no. We have to hear this phony stuff about how players sign with lesser teams because they really want to win. Save us.


Yeeeee-sssssss! Way to go, Asante. Saying it's not about the money, when really, that's all it's about! Thanks, Peter for calling him out. A super grande mochaccino half-caf with 3 shots of whatever you want in it, on me.

Regrets, I've had a few...

Regrets, I've had a few;
But then again, too few to mention.
I did what I had to do
And saw it through without exemption.
--- Frank Sinatra, "My Way"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


The well-tenured NY Times writer Murray Chass furthered a thought that I discussed last week, wondering if the pendulum had swung too far. Chass mentions that there were two major decisions made by the Yanks this season but only one of which could come back to haunt them: Letting Torre go and not trading for Johan Santana. (I think signing ARod is the 3rd major decision, but I'll let it go)


Chass, to his credit, doesn't get overly dramatic, but merely states what might happen, or what should have happened:

Maybe Phil Hughes, Ian Kennedy and Joba Chamberlain will become the reincarnation of Vic Raschi, Allie Reynolds and Eddie Lopat. But maybe they will be more reminiscent of Andy Hawkins, Dave LaPoint and Tim Leary, vintage 1990.

Maybe they will be everything the Yankees expect them to be. Maybe they will all succeed from the start. But maybe they won’t. Maybe they’ll stumble and sputter and need time to develop into consistent winners.
-----
Had the Yankees sent Hughes to the Twins for Santana, it would not have been Scott Kazmir for Víctor Zambrano. Had the Yankees traded Hughes, they would still have had Kennedy and Chamberlain.
-----
If the Yankees are certain that Hughes, Kennedy and Chamberlain will be the core of their starting rotation for the next 10 years, the decision was a good one. But that lack of a guarantee could prove to be troublesome.



All the above is certainly true and I mentioned it last Thursday. I wonder, now, after the lustre has worn off a bit, if the Yanks were being overly protective of these kids. Should the Yanks have taken the leap? Yes, Hal Steinbrenner was against the dollars being spent and Cashman was against the youth leaving. But, to get a 29 year old Santana.... maybe it would have been worth the risk. I pledge not to second-guess this to death once the season starts and I can only hope that Joba, Hughes and IPK live up to the impossibly high expectations, making it a moot point.


Lastly, my favorite comment from Chass' article tallies up the expiring contracts for the 2008 Yanks as they look ahead to 2009:

Coming off the payroll after this year should be Pettitte, Mussina, Carl Pavano and Kyle Farnsworth, a total of $44 million in pitchers alone, in addition to Jason Giambi and Bobby Abreu for a team total of $81 million.

$81MM!!!! I hope Sabathia and Mark Teixeira hear that. KRod, too! (Here is a list of the 2009 Free Agent class)

Monday, March 3, 2008

Big Baseball Roundtable

Well, it's finally posted, ready for all to see. I don't want to copy/paste the entire roundtable since that's not fair to Diesel who pulled it together, but I'll put only my answers below. Please, please, please check out the link above for the entire roundtable, it's more than worth it.

Jason Rosenberg is the author of the blog It IS About the Money, Stupid, the platform upon which he unleashes a daily fusillade of anti-hypocrisy rants that warm the cockles of Diesel's heart. Unfortunately, Jason is also a Yankees fan, which means that all the good deeds of the world will never stop him from ending up here. We kid, Jason; you can't be that bad of a guy, because you accept the fact that Jeter is absolute death going to his left.

Bud Selig asks you for two suggestions. Provided you don't ask him to resign, what ideas do you promote?
Rosenberg: First, I’d change some rules regarding the All Star game. I’d eliminate mandatory representation by every team, unless rosters expand to 32-35 to account for the expansion over the years. I’d also eliminate the “World Series” home field advantage bonus; it’s just an exhibition.

There are many subtle rules changes that I’d want to see changed to speed up the pace of the game but the main ones I’d propose would be a stricter enforcement of the “pitch clock”. Get on the hill or in the box or it’s an automatic strike or ball depending on the guilty party. I’d also change the rule requiring pitching 4 balls on an intentional walk. Call the intentional walk and send the runner to first. This is not Little League.

But my main “platform” involves making the game more kid-friendly. To do this, I’d make all Playoff and All Star games to begin at 7pm EST during the weekend and 6pm on week nights. This will be challenged by the West Coasters understandably but games cannot end after 11pm EST. No playoff games on the weekends will be scheduled during the evening. During the season, after every weekend day game, all kids 12 and under will be allowed to run the bases. I’d also give every kid 12 and under a raffle ticket upon admission to every game. Draw 10 tickets each game and the winners get to meet one player after the game. Can you imagine the impact this would have, to actually run the bases or meet a real ballplayer? Talk about building a lifetime connection to the game!

What's the one thing you don't think the industry is doing enough of, on the whole?
Rosenberg: As you can probably tell, one of my biggest “issues” lies within MLB’s ignoring of the kids with respect to game start times. This is most prevalent and important for the “showcase” games, including the all star game and the entire post season. Kids need to be more engaged with the ballplayers and the game. By allowing them to run the bases after every weekend day game will build an instant bond with the game. This can also be done by randomly selecting some number of kids (say 10) to meet a ballplayer after the game. Kids will not care who it is, just that they got to meet a real major leaguer. If that player gave each kid an autographed ball, all the better. It’s easy, it’s cheap and it’s the right thing to do to get kids re-invested in MLB. (Note to Brian Cashman: If you want me to come on board to help you with this, let me know! I’m ready and just 15 minutes away!)

Whom is the one player you're most excited to see play this season?
Rosenberg: Joba Chamberlain. A bit of a homer call but I want to see what he can do over an entire season. He was incredibly exciting to watch in limited action last year so I’m excited to see how he continues to develop.

Aside from guys on my hometown team, I want to see if Ryan Braun can match or better his 5 month blitzkrieg from last year.

What's the one thing that stands out the most to you about all the PED hand-wringing this offseason?
Rosenberg: How incredibly unnecessary and self-inflicted it all was/is. Selig didn’t have to commission the Mitchell Report. In addition, Clemens’ predicament is also seemingly self-inflicted with his apparent lying to a Congressional Committee. Clemens could have simply given the same excuse as Pettitte (“I did it to recover from injury”), gone quiet for some period of time, and go about his private life. He would have been a pariah for a while and likely never made the HOF, but if he took his celebrity and set out on an anti-steroids campaign, he’d be so much better off. Mark McGwire’s efforts to help the anti-steroids campaign rival OJ’s efforts to find the real killer, after all.

Who do you consider to be the most invaluable person in baseball?
Rosenberg: I’m not a huge Selig basher, and while I think as long as he’s Commissioner he’s the most important, that doesn’t make him the most invaluable (which I define as irreplaceable). I don’t think anyone is irreplaceable. I think the most invaluable person in baseball is the one who stands up to the Union and demands change in their stance regarding PEDs. Who that is, I am not exactly sure. I wish Jeter’s comments recently about blood testing were more assertive and definitive, but he’s not going to go that far. Not his style. Who is the conscience of the league? Who can force change even against the CBA? Can’t be Selig; it needs to come from within the players’ ranks, against the advice of Donald Fehr.

What non-favorite team of yours are you most interested in this season?
Rosenberg: They are becoming overhyped underdogs already, but I want to see what Tampa Bay can do this year and next. Can they finally make the leap? Besides them, I’m really excited to see what the Brewers can become. Great young talent there and it should be fun to watch.

What's the one annoying thing you hope this season will be the swan song for?
Rosenberg: Do I have to pick just one? So many things annoy me that I’d like to see gone for good, including: “Manny being Manny,” Congressional hearings involving baseball, mandatory representation in the All Star game, pink Red Sox hats, the Marlins, Fox broadcasts, Carl Pavano, and discussing how players are “reporting in the best shape of their lives."

What kind of contract are you offering Bonds right now if you're the GM of a team that can reasonably say it's bordering on contention?
Rosenberg: $5M guaranteed, with $1M bonuses at 400, 500, 550 and 600 at bats (including walks, naturally). Full protection for each game missed due to legal issues. Fully voidable if found guilty.



Great job, Diesel. Again, thanks for the invite. Can't wait to do another!!!

A new blog

Yes, Hank's finally pushed me too far. He's forced me to create a separate blog, just for him and his Hankisms.

Ladies and gentlemen, I present Hank Yankers, Featuring the Soothing Lyrical Stylings of Hank Steinbrenner

Will be updated daily, or whenever Mt. Blowhard erupts.

I'm begging: Someone muzzle Mt. Blowhard

I can't stand it anymore!!!

Really, as a Yankee fan, I can't stand hearing from Mt. Blowhard every week with some ridiculous proclamation, comment, ultimatum, threat. It's embarrassing and indefensible. As as honest a Yanks fan as I can be, the Sox have been a model of success the last few years. No, not just because they have won the whole shebang twice in four years, but because the way their organization operates. Senior ownership lets their trusted baseball operations staff do what they think is best for the organization, mixing in targeted and selected free agents with home grown talent. Great stuff, great model for long term success. And, they must be excited to see Hank taking the reigns the way he has. They must be praying for Hank to do something rash, which seems inevitable, doesn't it? Let's hope Cashman doesn't get axed after the first 3 game losing streak.

I just wish Hank would just turn off the mouth for a while. The games haven't even freakin' started yet!!!

Relevant recent articles on Mt. Blowhard: